Re: explain analyze output with parallel workers - question aboutmeaning of information for explain.depesz.com

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Kapila
Тема Re: explain analyze output with parallel workers - question aboutmeaning of information for explain.depesz.com
Дата
Msg-id CAA4eK1+XJ0pAUGsyxP_UF2hij1o6EbMgrv58kx8xi+AHDgNzhw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: explain analyze output with parallel workers - question aboutmeaning of information for explain.depesz.com  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 11:29 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 3:38 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 11:37 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:18 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Thanks.  I think now we can proceed with
>>>> fix_accum_instr_parallel_workers_v8.patch posted above which will fix
>>>> the original issue and the problem we have found in sort and hash
>>>> nodes.
>>>
>>> Committed and back-patched to v10.
>>
>> Thanks and attached find the rebased version that can be applied to
>> v9.6.  I have to change the test case to produce a stable output and
>> the reason for the change is that 9.6 doesn't have 'summary off'
>> option for Explain.
>
> This thread got lost in my inbox over Christmas, but I've now
> committed this back-port to REL9_6_STABLE.
>

Thanks!



-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning
Следующее
От: David Rowley
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning