Re: Assertion failure in SnapBuildInitialSnapshot()
| От | Amit Kapila | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Assertion failure in SnapBuildInitialSnapshot() | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAA4eK1+UArMy1hE32CMaVkVaD51MNJMeH5oEXc72O--ouh4gDA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст  | 
		
| Ответ на | Re: Assertion failure in SnapBuildInitialSnapshot() (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>) | 
| Ответы | 
                	
            		Re: Assertion failure in SnapBuildInitialSnapshot()
            		
            		 | 
		
| Список | pgsql-hackers | 
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 11:12 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 9:41 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I've attached patches for HEAD and backbranches. Please review them.
>
Shall we add a comment like the one below in
ReplicationSlotsComputeRequiredXmin()?
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/slot.c b/src/backend/replication/slot.c
index f286918f69..e28d48bca7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/slot.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/slot.c
@@ -840,6 +840,13 @@ ReplicationSlotsComputeRequiredXmin(bool already_locked)
        Assert(ReplicationSlotCtl != NULL);
+       /*
+        * It is possible that by the time we compute the agg_xmin
here and before
+        * updating replication_slot_xmin, the CreateInitDecodingContext() will
+        * compute and update replication_slot_xmin. So, we need to acquire
+        * ProcArrayLock here to avoid retreating the value of
replication_slot_xmin.
+        */
+
-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
		
	В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: