Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply

On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 9:06 AM Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)
<houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> On Friday, April 28, 2023 2:18 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Alexander, does the proposed patch fix the problem you are facing?
> > > Sawada-San, and others, do you see any better way to fix it than what
> > > has been proposed?
> >
> > I'm concerned that the idea of relying on IsNormalProcessingMode()
> > might not be robust since if we change the meaning of
> > IsNormalProcessingMode() some day it would silently break again. So I
> > prefer using something like InitializingApplyWorker, or another idea
> > would be to do cleanup work (e.g., fileset deletion and lock release)
> > in a separate callback that is registered after connecting to the
> > database.
>
> Thanks for the review. I agree that it’s better to use a new variable here.
> Attach the patch for the same.
>

+ *
+ * However, if the worker is being initialized, there is no need to release
+ * locks.
  */
- LockReleaseAll(DEFAULT_LOCKMETHOD, true);
+ if (!InitializingApplyWorker)
+ LockReleaseAll(DEFAULT_LOCKMETHOD, true);

Can we slightly reword this comment as: "The locks will be acquired
once the worker is initialized."?

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.