Re: Logical Replication of sequences
| От | Amit Kapila |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Logical Replication of sequences |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAA4eK1+Hb4H9z8C5kiuc42=w=Pi9dQAioJW=2OSr9eAnpoxF6w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Logical Replication of sequences (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
RE: Logical Replication of sequences
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 5:08 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 3:36 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > 0001 and 0002 looks good, > Thanks, I pushed 0001. I feel it is better to next commit refactoring patch v20251014-0003-Reorganize-tablesync-Code-and-Introduce-sy as that would be less controversial. What do you think? > except this duplicate version checking code below in fetch_relation_list [1][2], I mean check_relkind and sequence fetchingboth are related changes and start from version 19, so we can do a single check. Instead of the 'check_relkind'variable name we can change it to 'support_relkind_seq' or something like that and then we can use this inboth checks. > Sounds reasonable to me. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: