Re: [bug fix] pg_ctl fails with config-only directory

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Kapila
Тема Re: [bug fix] pg_ctl fails with config-only directory
Дата
Msg-id CAA4eK1+FPnqsd1TEYMU5A-msBmC73XezXogf0GFEAr_XQdt3mA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [bug fix] pg_ctl fails with config-only directory  ("MauMau" <maumau307@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [bug fix] pg_ctl fails with config-only directory
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 6:30 PM, MauMau <maumau307@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: "Amit Kapila" <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 7:57 PM, MauMau <maumau307@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>
>> Approach-2 has been discussed previously to resolve it and it doesn't seem
>> to be
>> a good way to handle it. Please refer link:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1339601668-sup-4658@alvh.no-ip.org
>>
>> You can go through that mail chain and see if there can be a better
>> solution than Approach-2.
>
>
> Thanks for the info.  I understand your feeling, but we need to be
> practical.  I believe we should not leave a bug and inconvenience by
> worrying about theory too much.  In addition to the config-only directory,
> the DBA with admin privs will naturally want to run "postgres -C" and
> "postgres --describe-config", because they are useful and so described in
> the manual.  I don't see any (at least big) risk in allowing postgres
> -C/--describe-config to run with admin privs.

Today, I had again gone through all the discussion that happened at
that time related to this problem
and I found that later in discussion it was discussed something on
lines as your Approach-2,
please see the link
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/503A879C.6070703@dunslane.net

> In addition, recent Windows
> versions help to secure the system by revoking admin privs with UAC, don't
> they?  Disabling UAC is not recommended.
>
> I couldn't find a way to let postgres delete its token groups from its own
> primary access token.  There doesn't seem to be a reasonably clean and good
> way.

Wouldn't the other way to resolve this problem be reinvoke pg_ctl in
non-restricted mode for the case in question?

> So I had to choose approach 2.  Please find attached the patch.  This simple
> and not-complex change worked well.  I'd like to add this to 2014-1
> commitfest this weekend unless a better approach is proposed.

I think it is important to resolve this problem, so please godhead and
upload this patch to next CF.


With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Fabien COELHO
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good
Следующее
От: Jeff Davis
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Extension Templates S03E11