On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 8:44 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 4:32 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> > and then, within an if():
> >
> > /*
> > * We don't try to do group update optimization if a process has
> > * overflowed the subxids array in its PGPROC, since in that case we
> > * don't have a complete list of XIDs for it.
> > */
> > Assert(THRESHOLD_SUBTRANS_CLOG_OPT <= PGPROC_MAX_CACHED_SUBXIDS);
> >
> > Even if these weren't redundant, it can't make sense to test such a
> > static condition only within an if? Is it possible this was actually
> > intended to test something different?
>
> Based on the comment, I imagine it might've been intended to read
> Assert(nsubxids <= PGPROC_MAX_CACHED_SUBXIDS).
>
Do you think we need such an Assert after having StaticAssert for
(THRESHOLD_SUBTRANS_CLOG_OPT <= PGPROC_MAX_CACHED_SUBXIDS) and then
an if statement containing (nsubxids <= THRESHOLD_SUBTRANS_CLOG_OPT)
just before this Assert? Sure, we can keep this for extra safety, but
I don't see the need for it.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com