Re: running logical replication as the subscription owner

On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 9:10 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 1:12 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 7:38 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Do we want the initial sync to also respect 'run_as_owner' option? I
> > > might be missing something but I don't see anything in the docs about
> > > initial sync interaction with this option. In the commit a2ab9c06ea,
> > > we did the permission checking during the initial sync so I thought we
> > > should do it here as well.
> >
> > It definitely should work that way. lf it doesn't, that's a bug.
>
> After some tests, it seems that the initial sync worker respects
> 'run_as_owner' during catching up but not during COPYing.
>

Yeah, I was worried during copy phase only. During catchup, the code
is common with apply worker code, so it will work.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.