Re: drop/truncate table sucks for large values of shared buffers

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Kapila
Тема Re: drop/truncate table sucks for large values of shared buffers
Дата
Msg-id CAA4eK1+8i7u4NAvQVNMYvH7i20Ue4Zg7FKXWjyLMRn9ryzHiMA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: drop/truncate table sucks for large values of shared buffers  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote:
>
> On 07/02/2015 04:18 PM, Amit Kapila wrote:
>>
>>
>> Don't you think the approach discussed (delayed cleanup of buffers
>> during checkpoint scan) is sufficient to fix the issues raised.
>
>
> Dunno, but there is no patch for that.
>

That's fair enough, however your reply sounded to me like there is
no further need to explore this idea, unless we have something like
radix tree based approach.


With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Reducing the size of BufferTag & remodeling forks
Следующее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: raw output from copy