Re: Remove the comment on the countereffectiveness of large shared_buffers on Windows

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Kapila
Тема Re: Remove the comment on the countereffectiveness of large shared_buffers on Windows
Дата
Msg-id CAA4eK1+8Tq5vHO=91=muBTgPqAp1PbnvJ0ctn6fX+6=g2+7VbA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Remove the comment on the countereffectiveness of large shared_buffers on Windows  ("Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 7:46 AM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki
<tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
>> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Amit Kapila
>> > shared_buffers  tps
>> > 256MB  990
>> > 512MB  813
>> > 1GB  1189
>> > 2GB  2258
>> > 4GB  5003
>> > 8GB  5062
>> >
>> > "512MB is the largest effective size" seems to be a superstition, although
>> I don't know the reason for the drop at 512MB.
>> >

Okay, not an issue.  I think above data indicates that we can remove
512MB limit for Windows from docs.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [sqlsmith] Failed assertion in parallel worker in ExecInitSubPlan
Следующее
От: Andreas Karlsson
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Contains and is contained by operators of inet datatypes