On 17 February 2012 16:29, David E. Wheeler <david@justatheory.com> wrote:
> On Feb 17, 2012, at 5:22 AM, Thom Brown wrote:
>
>> The purpose being to only have a single statement to set up the
>> trigger rather than setting up a separate trigger function which will
>> unlikely be re-used by other triggers... or is this of dubious
>> benefit?
>
> +1, though I imagine it would just give it a generated name and save it anyway, eh?
I had thought about that, yes, but I didn't want to get bogged down in
implementation.
--
Thom