On 30 May 2013 11:33, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 10:09 PM, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote:
>> On 29 May 2013 21:16, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote:
>>>> Howdy all,
>>>>
>>>> Whilst at PGCon I briefly discussed with Stefan the idea of providing
>>>> a jQuery-powered filtering system for the feature matrix. This is
>>>> because it's becoming increasingly bloated.
>>>>
>>>> Prototype attached. This should have no effect on those who have
>>>> Javascript disabled.
>>>>
>>>> Feedback welcome.
>>>
>>> A couple of things spring to mind:
>>>
>>> - I think it's more natural to have the checkboxes after the labels,
>>> not before, e.g.
>>>
>>> 8.3 [x] 8.4 [x] 9.0 [x]
>>>
>>> (I actually found it quite off-putting having them the other way around).
>>
>> I agree as it happens.
>
> Definitely an improvement.
>
>>> - By default, perhaps we should only show supported versions and
>>> betas/alphas, so the grid isn't too big when the user starts.
>>
>> Easy enough.
>>
>>> - Should we automatically hide obsolete features if they're obsolete
>>> in all displayed versions? Maybe that should be a checkable option (on
>>> by default) shown below the list of versions along with "Hide
>>> unchanged features"
>>
>> That should be the case with the "hide unchanged features" checkbox
>> checked anyway. The rule is, if it's the same value across all
>> displayed versions (regardless of whether they're all "Yes", "No" or
>> "Obsolete"), the row becomes hidden.
>
> Yeah, I get that. I'm just suggesting that obsolete features should be
> treated differently, as they're even less interesting than something
> that was implemented before the first version show.
>
> Regardless of that, I do think that checkbox should be on it's own line.
Unfortunately the latest version of my distro of choice was released
yesterday, so after 3 versions of not upgrading I decided to upgrade
(fresh install), but now I'm on Django 1.4.5/Python 2.7, and I can't
get the site running locally again. :/
--
Thom