Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade failed if view contain natural left join condition

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thom Brown
Тема Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade failed if view contain natural left join condition
Дата
Msg-id CAA-aLv6-Frq=+u8HT1uu9sZR7wP8ozi0mVfjZ119C6cTq3YD=g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на [HACKERS] pg_upgrade failed if view contain natural left join condition  (tushar <tushar.ahuja@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 20 July 2017 at 13:09, tushar <tushar.ahuja@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Steps to reproduce -
>
> v9.6
>
> postgres=# create table t(n int);
> CREATE TABLE
> postgres=# create table t1(a int);
> CREATE TABLE
> postgres=# create view ttt1 as SELECT e.n FROM t e NATURAL LEFT JOIN t1 d;
> CREATE VIEW
>
> v10 -
>
> run pg_upgrade -
>
> going to fail ,with this error -
>
> "
> pg_restore: creating TABLE "public.t"
> pg_restore: creating TABLE "public.t1"
> pg_restore: creating VIEW "public.ttt1"
> pg_restore: [archiver (db)] Error while PROCESSING TOC:
> pg_restore: [archiver (db)] Error from TOC entry 187; 1259 16390 VIEW ttt1
> edb
> pg_restore: [archiver (db)] could not execute query: ERROR:  syntax error at
> or near ")"
> LINE 16:      LEFT JOIN "t1" "d");
>                                 ^
>     Command was:
> -- For binary upgrade, must preserve pg_type oid
> SELECT
> pg_catalog.binary_upgrade_set_next_pg_type_oid('16392'::pg_catalog.oid);
>
>
> -- For binary upgrade, must preserve pg_type array oid
> SELECT
> pg_catalog.binary_upgrade_set_next_array_pg_type_oid('16391'::pg_catalog.oid);
>
>
> -- For binary upgrade, must preserve pg_class oids
> SELECT
> pg_catalog.binary_upgrade_set_next_heap_pg_class_oid('16390'::pg_catalog.oid);
>
> CREATE VIEW "ttt1" AS
>  SELECT "e"."n"
>    FROM ("t" "e"
>      LEFT JOIN "t1" "d");
>
> "
> I think -this issue should be there in the older branches as well but not
> checked that.

I get the same result on 9.2 and 10 in pg_dump output.

Thom



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Greg Stark
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] huge RAM use in multi-command ALTER of table heirarchy
Следующее
От: Thom Brown
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade failed if view is based on sequence