Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thom Brown
Тема Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning
Дата
Msg-id CAA-aLv4cL-HGBR7DD4KsGMPiC=0gtFxUsD=PpO1z+ckSKGuXzQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning  (amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning  (amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 14 September 2017 at 09:58, amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 7:43 PM, Jesper Pedersen
> <jesper.pedersen@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Amul,
>>
>> On 09/08/2017 08:40 AM, amul sul wrote:
>>>
>>> Rebased 0002 against this commit & renamed to 0001, PFA.
>>>
>>
>> This patch needs a rebase.
>>
>
> Thanks for your note.
> Attached is the patch rebased on the latest master head.
> Also added error on
> creating
> d
> efault partition
> for the hash partitioned table
> ,
> and updated document &
> test script for the same.

Sorry, but this needs another rebase as it's broken by commit
77b6b5e9ceca04dbd6f0f6cd3fc881519acc8714.

Thom


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256
Следующее
От: Andreas Joseph Krogh
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Clarification in pg10's pgupgrade.html step 10(upgrading standby servers)