Re: [PATCH] Support for Array ELEMENT Foreign Keys

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thom Brown
Тема Re: [PATCH] Support for Array ELEMENT Foreign Keys
Дата
Msg-id CAA-aLv437K=j24LuGoeOaz=Y6NN5o5tvMfMay=_7LtaEmVWz=Q@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PATCH] Support for Array ELEMENT Foreign Keys  (Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 25 October 2014 19:19, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote:
On 25 October 2014 13:28, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
Thom Brown wrote:
> On 24 October 2012 18:17, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> > Marco Nenciarini <marco.nenciarini@2ndquadrant.it> writes:
> > > Please find the attached refreshed patch (v2) which fixes the loose ends
> > > you found.
> >
> > Attached is a v3 patch that updates the syntax per discussion, uses what
> > seems to me to be a saner (more extensible) catalog representation, and
> > contains assorted other code cleanup.  I have not touched the
> > documentation at all except for catalogs.sgml, so it still explains the
> > old syntax.  I have to stop working on this now, because I've already
> > expended more time on it than I should, and it still has the serious
> > problems mentioned in
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/16787.1351053391@sss.pgh.pa.us
> > and
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/28389.1351094795@sss.pgh.pa.us
> >
> > I'm going to mark this Returned With Feedback for the current CF.
> >
>
> Does anyone have any intention of resurrecting this at this stage?

Not in this room.  Do you?

I'm not qualified to, but I'm happy to make time to test it when it next gets picked up.  My email was really just bumping the topic.

I should mention that the latest patch no longer applies against git master, so I can't test it in its current form.
--
Thom

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Greg Stark
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: How ugly would this be? (ALTER DATABASE)
Следующее
От: Haribabu Kommi
Дата:
Сообщение: Possible problem with shm_mq spin lock