Re: RPM Packaging Question - Fedora 28 & Postgis

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От John Woltman
Тема Re: RPM Packaging Question - Fedora 28 & Postgis
Дата
Msg-id CA+wMe6U5QCFFTCxy_1hM=ThUpVdaWzdnQtSFAkn4ngirVCqymw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: RPM Packaging Question - Fedora 28 & Postgis  (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>)
Ответы Re: RPM Packaging Question - Fedora 28 & Postgis
Список pgsql-general
According to "dnf info", the repo is pgdg95, which I got from the Postgres website.  Since this looks like a packaging bug and not specifically a Postgres bug, should I submit it pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org?

-John

John Woltman
TPI • 302 New Mill Lane • Exton, PA 19341 • (610) 524-7260


On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:12 PM, Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> wrote:
On 06/01/2018 10:06 AM, John Woltman wrote:
I'm attempting to install PostGIS2 (specifically postgis2_95 for Postgres 9.5) on Fedora 28.  When I run ``sudo dnf install postgis23_95`` I get the the following the error:

Error:
   Problem: conflicting requests
      - nothing provides geos36 >= 3.6.2 needed by postgis23_95

Fedora 28 provides GEOS 3.6.1.  Is my issue something that I should bring up to the Fedora maintainers or to whoever's in charge of the Postgres Yum repos?

What repo source are you using for the PostGIS package?



Thank you,
John

John Woltman
TPI • 302 New Mill Lane • Exton, PA 19341 • (610) 524-7260



--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Guyren Howe
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Whither 1:1?
Следующее
От: Adrian Klaver
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: RPM Packaging Question - Fedora 28 & Postgis