Re: [PATCH] Add pg_get_subscription_ddl() function
| От | Vaibhav Dalvi |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [PATCH] Add pg_get_subscription_ddl() function |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+vB=AGAxwPMPpppk46bRm0T+3CrLPKWkehMVtfSYMef+Rndnw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Add pg_get_subscription_ddl() function (Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] Add pg_get_subscription_ddl() function
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Alvaro,
I tried to get rid of String usage in 0001 patch.
Prepared 0002 patch for actual implementation of the
function p_get_subscription_ddl().
Please find attached patches.
Regards,
Vaibhav
On Fri, Nov 7, 2025 at 5:41 PM Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de> wrote:
On 2025-Nov-07, Vaibhav Dalvi wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2025 at 9:18 PM Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de> wrote:
>
> > Hello Vaibhav,
> >
> > I wonder why is Subscription->publications a list of String rather than
> > a list of C strings. That's something you'd see in a Node structure,
> > but Subscription is not a node, so this seems wasteful and pointless.
> >
>
> I looked more into this and came to know that we can't make
> Subscription->publications a list of C strings because input publications
> list is also in the list of String from the parser:
>
> CreateSubscriptionStmt:
> CREATE SUBSCRIPTION name CONNECTION Sconst PUBLICATION name_list
> opt_definition
> {
> CreateSubscriptionStmt *n =
> makeNode(CreateSubscriptionStmt);
> n->subname = $3;
> n->conninfo = $5;
> n->publication = $7;
> n->options = $8;
> $$ = (Node *) n;
> };
But this is a CreateSubscriptionStmt (which is indeed a Node), not a
Subscription (which isn't). Different thing.
--
Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"In fact, the basic problem with Perl 5's subroutines is that they're not
crufty enough, so the cruft leaks out into user-defined code instead, by
the Conservation of Cruft Principle." (Larry Wall, Apocalypse 6)
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: