Re: VACUUM fails to parse 0 and 1 as boolean value

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dmitry Dolgov
Тема Re: VACUUM fails to parse 0 and 1 as boolean value
Дата
Msg-id CA+q6zcXcfcxU3QXXvT0b+fKRk507HJi-s1EhmyJBq8LFsjr-KA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: VACUUM fails to parse 0 and 1 as boolean value  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 9:20 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On May 20, 2019 12:14:30 PM PDT, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 8:56 PM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
> >wrote:
> >>
> >> Yes. Thanks for the comment!
> >> Attached is the updated version of the patch.
> >> It adds such common rule.
> >
> >If I understand correctly, it resulted in the commit fc7c281f8. For
> >some reason
> >it breaks vacuum tests for me, is it expected?
> >
> >     ANALYZE (nonexistent-arg) does_not_exist;
> >    -ERROR:  syntax error at or near "-"
> >    +ERROR:  syntax error at or near "arg"
> >     LINE 1: ANALYZE (nonexistent-arg) does_not_exist;
> >    -                            ^
> >    +                             ^
> >     ANALYZE (nonexistentarg) does_not_exit;
>
> That has since been fixed, right?

Yep, right, after I've checkout 47a14c99e471. Sorry for the noise.



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: VACUUM fails to parse 0 and 1 as boolean value
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Question about new pg12 feature no-rewrite timestamp totimestamptz conversion