Re: [HACKERS][PATCH] Applying PMDK to WAL operations for persistent memory

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dmitry Dolgov
Тема Re: [HACKERS][PATCH] Applying PMDK to WAL operations for persistent memory
Дата
Msg-id CA+q6zcWYEVfSCNe_K8+9gY=N4rMj3tDnsx1MGeNjNQGiXTpZNw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS][PATCH] Applying PMDK to WAL operations for persistent memory  (Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS][PATCH] Applying PMDK to WAL operations for persistentmemory  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 6:48 PM Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 4:53 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 06:00:54PM +0900, Yoshimi Ichiyanagi wrote:
> > > The libpmem's pmem_map_file() supported 2M/1G(the size of huge page)
> > > alignment, since it could reduce the number of page faults.
> > > In addition, libpmem's pmem_memcpy_nodrain() is the function
> > > to copy data using single instruction, multiple data(SIMD) instructions
> > > and NT store instructions(MOVNT).
> > > As a result, using these APIs is faster than using old mmap()/memcpy().
> > >
> > > Please see the PGCon2018 presentation[1] for the details.
> > >
> > > [1] https://www.pgcon.org/2018/schedule/attachments/507_PGCon2018_Introducing_PMDK_into_PostgreSQL.pdf
> >
> > So you say that this represents a 3% gain based on the presentation?
> > That may be interesting to dig into it.  Could you provide fresher
> > performance numbers?  I am moving this patch to the next CF 2018-10 for
> > now, waiting for input from the author.
>
> Unfortunately, the patch has some conflicts now, so probably not only fresher
> performance numbers are necessary, but also a rebased version.

I believe the idea behind this patch is quite important (thanks to CMU DG for
inspiring lectures), so I decided to put some efforts and rebase it to prevent
from rotting. At the same time I have a vague impression that the patch itself
suggests quite narrow way of using of PMDK.

> On 01/03/18 12:40, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> > On 16/01/18 15:00, Yoshimi Ichiyanagi wrote:
> >> These patches enable to use Persistent Memory Development Kit(PMDK)[1]
> >> for reading/writing WAL logs on persistent memory(PMEM).
> >> PMEM is next generation storage and it has a number of nice features:
> >> fast, byte-addressable and non-volatile.
> >
> > Interesting. How does this compare with using good old mmap()?

E.g. byte-addressability is not used here at all, and it's probably one of the
most cool properties, when we write not a block/page, but a small amount of
data and flush it using PMDK.

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Sketch of a fix for that truncation data corruption issue
Следующее
От: Alexander Korotkov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Connections hang indefinitely while taking a gin index's LWLockbuffer_content lock