> On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 7:41 PM Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
> On 11/17/18 9:55 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > The comment in expand_dbname_patterns is ungrammatical and mentions
> > "OID" rather than "name", so I suggest
>
> Will fix.
>
> > Other than that, the patch seems fine to me -- I tested and it works as
> > intended.
> >
> > Personally I would say "See also expand_table_name_patterns" instead of
> > "This is similar to code in pg_dump.c for handling matching table names.",
> > as well as mention this function in expand_table_name_patterns' comment.
> > (No need to mention expand_schema_name_patterns, since these are
> > adjacent.) But this is mostly stylistic and left to your own judgement.
> >
> > In the long run, I think we should add an option to processSQLNamePattern
> > to use OR instead of AND, which would fix both this problem as well as
> > pg_dump's. I don't think that's important enough to stall this patch.
>
> Thanks for the review.
Unfortunately judging from cfbot output patch needs to be rebased, could you
please post an updated version with those fixes mentioned above?