Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dmitry Dolgov
Тема Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq
Дата
Msg-id CA+q6zcU615Gq1qt1Z2HNHDFFWS5je1DtsuOvAYeHw1XjCOpFHw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq  (Nikhil Sontakke <nikhils@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 8:34 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 02:18:09PM +0100, Daniel Verite wrote:
> > There's a batch mode for pgbench in a patch posted in [1],
> > with \beginbatch and \endbatch commands, but nothing
> > for psql AFAICS.
> > psql is more complicated because currently it uses a
> > blocking PQexec() call at its core. Craig mentioned psql
> > integration in [2] and [3].
>
> This patch has been around for some time now, the last version fails to
> apply cleanly and in-depth reviews have happened.  I am moving that to
> the next CF, waiting on its author.

Unfortunately, nothing was changed since then, so there is already some amount
of unaddressed review feedback. I'll move this patch to "Returned with
feedback".


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Dmitry Dolgov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Sample values for pg_stat_statements
Следующее
От: Dmitry Dolgov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Moving relation extension locks out of heavyweight lock manager