Re: binary protocol, again

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Daniele Varrazzo
Тема Re: binary protocol, again
Дата
Msg-id CA+mi_8bZOH0bohoUNuz2VT2xhFuGgq26gi54_nC4sRaUczQ7pQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: binary protocol, again  ("P. Christeas" <xrg@linux.gr>)
Ответы Re: binary protocol, again  ("P. Christeas" <xrg@linux.gr>)
Список psycopg
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 6:09 PM, P. Christeas <xrg@linux.gr> wrote:

>> 3. using PQexecParams instead PQexec
> Yes, when query is eligible.

Uhm... what is an eligible query?

Are you changing the behaviour of the current cursor class or
introducing a new one? I'd go most definitely for the second, as I'm
afraid the first would break a lot of the existing usage.

In particular, what I'd like to see is a protocol ISQLParam, to live
together with the current ISQLQuote, in order to create a clear
distinction between the capabilities of the two cursors and avoid
bloating the current adapters interface.

As a reference, here is the original message of mine, highlighting
some of the features we may get by splitting the two protocols:
<http://archives.postgresql.org/psycopg/2011-02/msg00076.php>.

Cheers,

-- Daniele

В списке psycopg по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "P. Christeas"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: binary protocol, again
Следующее
От: "P. Christeas"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: binary protocol, again