Re: RFC: Extend psycopg2.connect to accept all valid parameters?

On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Daniele Varrazzo
<daniele.varrazzo@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Federico Di Gregorio <fog@dndg.it> wrote:
>
>> Looks good but I have a question: does automatic conversion always
>> generates a valid connection string? Do we need quoting for some of the
>> parameters?
>
> No: just find the docs of the connection string escaping rule.

I mean: does automatic conversion always generate a valid dns? No. Do
we need quoting: yes.

-- Daniele