Re: IO in wrong state on riscv64
| От | Thomas Munro |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: IO in wrong state on riscv64 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+hUKGLuNvLxdiwGQYjTWzh0W3JQoqegmOa9eOgpAPNDr-M+mg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: IO in wrong state on riscv64 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: IO in wrong state on riscv64
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Nov 8, 2025 at 1:03 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > You're a brave man to be pushing this into the last-ever release > of v13 with all of 12 hours remaining till code freeze. I don't > mind so much for the newer branches, but I'm feeling nervous > about the risk/reward ratio for v13. I figured "adding a no-op compiler barrier where we already believed there to be a compiler barrier and rely on it crucially" was pretty safe as these things go, but that's a good point about v13 and I can revert it in that one branch in a couple of hours if that's the consensus.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: