Re: A question about wording in messages

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thomas Munro
Тема Re: A question about wording in messages
Дата
Msg-id CA+hUKGLsEeC-0SnPDJZh9Cbk0vXCCy1ttPD-MXDP=R2kDemGkQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: A question about wording in messages  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: A question about wording in messages
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 2:38 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> writes:
> > I saw the following message recently modified.
> >> This controls the maximum distance we can read ahead in the WAL to prefetch referenced data blocks.
> > Maybe the "we" means "PostgreSQL program and you" but I see it
> > somewhat out of place.
>
> +1, I saw that today and thought it was outside our usual style.
> The whole thing is awfully verbose for a GUC description, too.
> Maybe
>
> "Maximum distance to read ahead in WAL to prefetch data blocks."

+1

For "we", I must have been distracted by code comment style.  For the
extra useless verbiage, it's common for GUC description to begin "This
control/affects/blah" like that, but I agree it's useless noise.

For the other cases, Amit's suggestion of 'server' seems sensible to me.



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jacob Champion
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Kerberos delegation support in libpq and postgres_fdw
Следующее
От: David Rowley
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: remove_useless_groupby_columns is too enthusiastic