Re: Pre-proposal: unicode normalized text

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thomas Munro
Тема Re: Pre-proposal: unicode normalized text
Дата
Msg-id CA+hUKGLovvAXim9Fytn=jxks9s=JhP5=8Oyy0cbxGG-ggALJtg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Pre-proposal: unicode normalized text  (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Pre-proposal: unicode normalized text  (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 9:01 PM David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Nov 2023 at 20:49, Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2023-11-03 at 10:51 +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > > bowerbird and hammerkop didn't like commit a02b37fc.  They're still
> > > using the old 3rd build system that is not tested by CI.  It's due
> > > for
> > > removal in the 17 cycle IIUC but in the meantime I guess the new
> > > codegen script needs to be invoked by something under src/tools/msvc?
> > >
> > >   varlena.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol
> > > unicode_category referenced in function unicode_assigned
> > > [H:\\prog\\bf\\root\\HEAD\\pgsql.build\\postgres.vcxproj]
> >
> > I think I just need to add unicode_category.c to @pgcommonallfiles in
> > Mkvcbuild.pm. I'll do a trial commit tomorrow and see if that fixes it
> > unless someone has a better suggestion.
>
> (I didn't realise this was being discussed.)
>
> Thomas mentioned this to me earlier today. After looking I also
> concluded that unicode_category.c needed to be added to
> @pgcommonallfiles. After looking at the time, I didn't expect you to
> be around so opted just to push that to fix the MSVC buildfarm
> members.

Shouldn't it be added unconditionally near unicode_norm.c?  It looks
like it was accidentally made conditional on openssl, which might
explain why it worked for David but not for bowerbird.



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Draft back-branch release notes are up
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Inconsistent use of "volatile" when accessing shared memory?