Re: Suppressing useless wakeups in walreceiver

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thomas Munro
Тема Re: Suppressing useless wakeups in walreceiver
Дата
Msg-id CA+hUKGLYc7iSh2Eg65HsH49tjPM=AERW-R=2-zg_mORXc+WdeQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Suppressing useless wakeups in walreceiver  (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Suppressing useless wakeups in walreceiver  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Tue, Nov 8, 2022 at 9:20 PM Bharath Rupireddy
<bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks. Do we need a similar wakeup approach for logical replication
> workers in worker.c? Or is it okay that the nap time is 1sec there?

Yeah, I think so.  At least for its idle/nap case (waiting for flush
is also a technically interesting case, but harder, and applies to
non-idle systems so the polling is a little less offensive).

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Ronan Dunklau
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Add proper planner support for ORDER BY / DISTINCT aggregates
Следующее
От: Andy Fan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Condition pushdown: why (=) is pushed down into join, but BETWEEN or >= is not?