On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 9:16 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes:
> > So I think we probably need something like the attached, which I was
> > originally trying to avoid.
>
> Yeah, something like that. I also wonder if you don't need to think
> a bit harder about the ordering of the flag checks, in particular
> it seems like servicing reload_request before child_exit might be
> a good idea (remembering that child_exit might cause launching of
> new children, so we want to be up to speed on relevant settings).
Agreed, and done.