On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 4:51 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thomas, are you planning to continue with this patch? If not, I don't mind
> picking it up.
Hi Nathan,
Please go ahead! One thing I had in my notes to check with this patch
is whether there might be a bug due to computing all times in
microseconds, but sleeping for a number of milliseconds without
rounding up (what I mean is that if it's trying to sleep for 900
microseconds, it might finish up sleeping for 0 milliseconds in a
tight loop a few times).