Re: seawasp failing, maybe in glibc allocator

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thomas Munro
Тема Re: seawasp failing, maybe in glibc allocator
Дата
Msg-id CA+hUKGLAr-n-4dUcAmqE8F_gyC9WsjkKdxu4aDcq96pPUTZRqQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: seawasp failing, maybe in glibc allocator  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Ответы Re: seawasp failing, maybe in glibc allocator  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Re: seawasp failing, maybe in glibc allocator  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 12:25 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On 2021-05-21 15:57:01 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > I found the LLVM commit to blame (c8fc5e3ba942057d6c4cdcd1faeae69a28e7b671).
> > Contacting the author and reading the change to see if I can spit the
> > issue myself.
>
> Hrmpf. It's a silent API breakage. The author intended to email us about
> it, but apparently forgot. One now needs to increment a string-pool
> refcount. The reason that didn't trigger a reliable crash is that
> there's a path where the refcount of string-pool entries aren't asserted
> to be above before decrementing the refcount... And that there
> practically never are references to the pool entries after use.
>
> Continuing to discusss whether there's a better way to deal with this.

Any news?

FWIW this change appears to fix the problem for my system (LLVM 13
build from a couple of days ago).  No more weird results, valgrind
errors gone.  I ran the leak checker to see if I now had the opposite
problem, and although there are various leaks reported, I didn't see
obvious intern pool related stacks.

diff --git a/src/backend/jit/llvm/llvmjit.c b/src/backend/jit/llvm/llvmjit.c
index 71029a39a9..7b09e520f5 100644
--- a/src/backend/jit/llvm/llvmjit.c
+++ b/src/backend/jit/llvm/llvmjit.c
@@ -1116,6 +1116,11 @@
llvm_resolve_symbols(LLVMOrcDefinitionGeneratorRef GeneratorObj, void
*Ctx,
        if (error != LLVMErrorSuccess)
                LLVMOrcDisposeMaterializationUnit(mu);

+#if LLVM_VERSION_MAJOR > 12
+       for (int i = 0; i < LookupSetSize; i++)
+               LLVMOrcRetainSymbolStringPoolEntry(symbols[i].Name);
+#endif
+
        pfree(symbols);

        return error;



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Fabien COELHO
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Failures with gcd functions with GCC snapshots GCC and -O3 (?)
Следующее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Fix for segfault in logical replication on master