Re: Segfault in jit tuple deforming on arm64 due to LLVM issue
От | Thomas Munro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Segfault in jit tuple deforming on arm64 due to LLVM issue |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+hUKGL-DxDV047zZWZ2yEiFxe91Edv+JT7=Z6FUOts0N7OZ+A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Segfault in jit tuple deforming on arm64 due to LLVM issue (Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin.bonnefoy@datadoghq.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 10:36 PM Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin.bonnefoy@datadoghq.com> wrote: > I've run some additional tests, mostly pgbench with > options=-cjit_above_cost=0 for an extended duration on an instance > that was impacted. I haven't seen any issues nor performance > regressions compared to the unpatched version. > > I will switch the commitfest entry to Ready for Committer if there's > no objection. Thanks! I'm going to go ahead and commit this. I asked Andres if he wanted to object to this plan (as author of our LLVM stuff) and he did not. I tried, for several frustrating days, to figure out how to solve our problem using JITLink and stay on a more "supported" path, but it all seems a bit unready, as various things don't work or aren't available in various versions in our support range. At least I now have the bones of a patch to prepare for JITLink in LLVM 20 or whenever they force our hand... I'll write about that in a new thread soon.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: