Re: Dead code in ps_status.c
| От | Thomas Munro |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Dead code in ps_status.c |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+hUKGKt0JavEGD-P27rQwXYKAccCWXr=K+xTLHcoDrsuzydTg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Dead code in ps_status.c (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 17, 2025 at 10:36 PM Michael Banck <mbanck@gmx.net> wrote: > I mentioned that in a follow-up[0] to my original mail that you > apparently did not see eiter: > > |By the way, on the back branches from 13-15 (before the above commit) > |process title changes don't work either, presumably because __hurd__ (as > |opposed to __GNU__ and __gnu_hurd__) has not been defined on GNU/Hurd > |for ages (or ever?), see > |https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/master/gcc/config/gnu.h#L25 > | > |So in case this get backpatched, I think it should be changed to > |PS_USE_CLOBBER_ARGV there as well. > > So yeah, I think those would be useful to fix. If you have a patch, I am > happy to test it, or I can come up with one (but not sure I manage this > week). Ahh, yeah, I'd missed that one too. The mail is definitely getting through now, though. With that information, it seemed pretty clear what to do, so I went ahead and back-patched to 14 and 15.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: