Re: Second-granular timezone offset format not documented

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thomas Munro
Тема Re: Second-granular timezone offset format not documented
Дата
Msg-id CA+hUKGK6BNyxbaynMdp6bGgsik+x9Q0hnKvZxgFd3HkPC=ko2w@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Second-granular timezone offset format not documented  (PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>)
Ответы Re: Second-granular timezone offset format not documented  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-docs
On Mon, Jul 5, 2021 at 9:56 AM PG Doc comments form
<noreply@postgresql.org> wrote:
> Note how the response has a very weird timezone offset. I guess it is valid,

As for whether it's valid, that's coming from the IANA tz dataset.  It
has a moment that it believes standard time to have begun at each
location, in this case:

Z America/Mexico_City -6:36:36 - LMT 1922 Ja 1 0:23:24

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_in_Mexico#History seems to agree on
the year at least.  That "local mean time" offset is computed from the
location's longitude, for lack of anything better.  The tzinfo
"Theory" file has a bunch of disclaimers about pre-1970 data though,
including "the tz database's LMT offsets should not be considered
meaningful".



В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Second-granular timezone offset format not documented
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Second-granular timezone offset format not documented