Re: What is "wraparound failure", really?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thomas Munro
Тема Re: What is "wraparound failure", really?
Дата
Msg-id CA+hUKGK48vNvdM+y+oQy+u0jsKLJFV1=3b_U1MON3f3akoxyJQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на What is "wraparound failure", really?  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 8:36 AM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
> "The sole disadvantage of increasing autovacuum_freeze_max_age (and
> vacuum_freeze_table_age along with it) is that the pg_xact and
> pg_commit_ts subdirectories of the database cluster will take more
> space..."

Just by the way, if we're updating this sentence, it continues
"because it must store..." but it should surely be "because they must
store...".

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Smith
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Fix uninitialized copy_data var (src/backend/commands/subscriptioncmds.c)
Следующее
От: "kato-sho@fujitsu.com"
Дата:
Сообщение: RE: Farewell greeting