On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 9:14 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Based on this, it seems fairly likely that crake is simply timing out
> as a consequence of intermittent heavy background activity.
Would it be better to keep going as long as progress is being made?
I.e. time out only when the relevant LSN stops advancing for N
seconds? Or something like that...