Re: Isolation tests vs. SERIALIZABLE isolation level

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thomas Munro
Тема Re: Isolation tests vs. SERIALIZABLE isolation level
Дата
Msg-id CA+hUKGJ9bsr_byg=DKf6yjDdNS-rizQk5hYMMWFBA3_b0Barog@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Isolation tests vs. SERIALIZABLE isolation level  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 2:09 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> * Do we still care about that policy?

> * If so, who's going to fix the above-listed problems?

> * Should we try to get some routine testing of this case
> in place?

I wondered the same in commit 37929599 (the same problem for
src/test/regress, which now passes but only in master, not the back
branches).  I doubt it will find real bugs very often, and I doubt
many people would enjoy the slowdown if it were always on, but it
might make sense to have something like PG_TEST_EXTRA that can be used
to run the tests at all three levels, and then turn that on in a few
strategic places like CI and a BF animal or two.



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Masahiko Sawada
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Improving the isolationtester: fewer failures, less delay