Re: Snapshot related assert failure on skink
От | Thomas Munro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Snapshot related assert failure on skink |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+hUKGJ7VNSKuPPEpzjUS5Edrg+0dVLAMDprMZcou_MoX0BPnQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Snapshot related assert failure on skink (Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me>) |
Ответы |
Re: Snapshot related assert failure on skink
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 12:59 AM Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me> wrote: > On 3/17/25 12:36, Tomas Vondra wrote: > > I'm still fiddling with the script, trying to increase the probability > > of the (apparent) race condition. On one machine (old Xeon) I can hit it > > very easily/reliably, while on a different machine (new Ryzen) it's very > > rare. I don't know if that's due to difference in speed of the CPU, or > > fewer cores, ... I guess it changes the timing just enough. > > > > I've also tried running the stress test on PG17, and I'm yet to see a > > single failure there. Not even on the xeon machine, that hits it > > reliably on 18. So this seems to be a PG18-only issue. > > > > And of course, the moment I sent this, I got a failure on 17 too. But > it's seems much harder to hit (compared to 18). Could there be a connection to this commit? commit 119c23eb9819213551cbe7e7665c8b493c59ceee Author: Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> Date: Tue Sep 5 13:59:06 2023 -0700 Replace known_assigned_xids_lck with memory barriers.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: