Re: Adding NetBSD and OpenBSD to Postgres CI
От | Thomas Munro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Adding NetBSD and OpenBSD to Postgres CI |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+hUKG+q-s44yTmyREmMnTivcR0U57zW8zUJL4sLW2Hdu0fm=A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Adding NetBSD and OpenBSD to Postgres CI (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Adding NetBSD and OpenBSD to Postgres CI
Re: Adding NetBSD and OpenBSD to Postgres CI |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Mar 2, 2025 at 1:37 AM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 1, 2025 at 6:24 AM Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think I found the problem, sd0j's fstype is not a swap. It worked like that: > > > > $ disklabel -E sd0 > > $ umount /usr/obj > > $ disklabel -E sd0 # prompts are: m -> j -> \n -> \n -> swap -> w -> q > > $ disklabel -E sd0 > > $ swapon /dev/sd0j # runs successfully > > Thanks! I just piped those characters in and it worked, shaving > another couple of minutes off. The script is probably now about as > short and sweet as it needs to be? And the times are pretty good. > > https://cirrus-ci.com/build/5275349266726912 And pushed. I propose to turn these on by default tomorrow, unless someone speaks up with reasons why we shouldn't. One non-reason to hold off is a one-off report[1] from Jacob about an unexplained failure of the oauth tests on NetBSD, but I'd prefer to see it flap if it's going to so we can collect clues and tackle it. Oauth test coverage is coming on in the build farm slowly anyway, no reason to hide it from our first line of defence... [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAOYmi%2Bkr-Eh7utEDZBFq8Mc9byLLRF3ZNc0TaHt78SKwB4T5KA%40mail.gmail.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: