Re: wrong fds used for refilenodes after pg_upgrade relfilenode changes Reply-To:
От
Thomas Munro
Тема
Re: wrong fds used for refilenodes after pg_upgrade relfilenode changes Reply-To:
Дата
Msg-id
CA+hUKG+ge5j_r4bDxkzL-S2zmUWrgvnG6GiN3OeVjhvofcWXVg@mail.gmail.com
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
wrong fds used for refilenodes after pg_upgrade relfilenode changes Reply-To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: wrong fds used for refilenodes after pg_upgrade relfilenode changes Reply-To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Re: wrong fds used for refilenodes after pg_upgrade relfilenode changes Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: wrong fds used for refilenodes after pg_upgrade relfilenode changes Reply-To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: wrong fds used for refilenodes after pg_upgrade relfilenode changes Reply-To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: wrong fds used for refilenodes after pg_upgrade relfilenode changes Reply-To: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: wrong fds used for refilenodes after pg_upgrade relfilenode changes Reply-To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: wrong fds used for refilenodes after pg_upgrade relfilenode changes Reply-To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: wrong fds used for refilenodes after pg_upgrade relfilenode changes Reply-To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: wrong fds used for refilenodes after pg_upgrade relfilenode changes Reply-To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: wrong fds used for refilenodes after pg_upgrade relfilenode changes Reply-To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: wrong fds used for refilenodes after pg_upgrade relfilenode changes Reply-To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: wrong fds used for refilenodes after pg_upgrade relfilenode changes Reply-To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: wrong fds used for refilenodes after pg_upgrade relfilenode changes Reply-To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: wrong fds used for refilenodes after pg_upgrade relfilenode changes Reply-To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: wrong fds used for refilenodes after pg_upgrade relfilenode changes Reply-To: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: wrong fds used for refilenodes after pg_upgrade relfilenode changes Reply-To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: wrong fds used for refilenodes after pg_upgrade relfilenode changes Reply-To: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: wrong fds used for refilenodes after pg_upgrade relfilenode changes Reply-To: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: wrong fds used for refilenodes after pg_upgrade relfilenode changes Reply-To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: wrong fds used for refilenodes after pg_upgrade relfilenode changes Reply-To: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: wrong fds used for refilenodes after pg_upgrade relfilenode changes Reply-To: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: wrong fds used for refilenodes after pg_upgrade relfilenode changes Reply-To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: wrong fds used for refilenodes after pg_upgrade relfilenode changes Reply-To: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: wrong fds used for refilenodes after pg_upgrade relfilenode changes Reply-To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: wrong fds used for refilenodes after pg_upgrade relfilenode changes Reply-To: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: wrong fds used for refilenodes after pg_upgrade relfilenode changes Reply-To: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: wrong fds used for refilenodes after pg_upgrade relfilenode changes Reply-To: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: wrong fds used for refilenodes after pg_upgrade relfilenode changes Reply-To: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: wrong fds used for refilenodes after pg_upgrade relfilenode changes Reply-To: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: wrong fds used for refilenodes after pg_upgrade relfilenode changes Reply-To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: wrong fds used for refilenodes after pg_upgrade relfilenode changes Reply-To: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: wrong fds used for refilenodes after pg_upgrade relfilenode changes Reply-To: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: wrong fds used for refilenodes after pg_upgrade relfilenode changes Reply-To: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: wrong fds used for refilenodes after pg_upgrade relfilenode changes Reply-To: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: wrong fds used for refilenodes after pg_upgrade relfilenode changes Reply-To: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: wrong fds used for refilenodes after pg_upgrade relfilenode changes Reply-To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: wrong fds used for refilenodes after pg_upgrade relfilenode changes Reply-To: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: wrong fds used for refilenodes after pg_upgrade relfilenode changes Reply-To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 8:53 AM Thomas Munro wrote: > Got some off-list clues: that's just distracting Perl cleanup noise > after something else went wrong (thanks Robert), and now I'm testing a > theory from Andres that we're missing a barrier on the redo side when > replaying XLOG_DBASE_CREATE_FILE_COPY. More soon. Yeah, looks like that was the explanation. Presumably in older releases, recovery can fail with EACCES here, and since commit e2f0f8ed we get ENOENT, because someone's got an unlinked file open, and ReadDir() can still see it. (I've wondered before if ReadDir() should also hide zombie Windows directory entries, but that's kinda independent and would only get us one step further, a later rmdir() would still fail.) Adding the barrier fixes the problem. Assuming no objections or CI failures show up, I'll consider pushing the first two patches tomorrow.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Amit Kapila
Дата: