On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 11:49 AM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 11:39 AM Alex Aktsipetrov <alex.akts@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Attaching the patch that fixes the issue, although I am not familiar with the codebase to be sure that it is the
rightidea.
>
> Thanks for the report and the proposed fix!
The repro works for me, and I think the patch is correct. Here's a
version with that line moved to a more natural place IMHO.
> Hmm, I wonder if EPQ might be involved in bug report #15720 (version 11.2):
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/15720-38c2b29e5d720187%40postgresql.org
I think it's highly likely that bug #15720 was a case of this bug and
would be fixed by this patch. Alex's repro doesn't work on 11 though,
because EPQ is not entered at all. Which raises the question: why do
we need to enter EPQ after commit ad0bda5d on 12/master, for a row
that hasn't been updated by anyone else?
--
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com