Re: Missing include in be-secure-openssl.c?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thomas Munro
Тема Re: Missing include in be-secure-openssl.c?
Дата
Msg-id CA+hUKG+VfJ6g4JoHpdFKVcpsT7o5GQy_74uGPethXQDSYnkcEQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Missing include in be-secure-openssl.c?  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Ответы Re: Missing include in be-secure-openssl.c?  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 3:16 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 10:56:13AM +0900, 近藤雄太 wrote:
> > We'll check it again, but there is no difference between HEAD and v14 branch.
> > We simply added v14 branch to build recently, and did not change any settings of HEAD at that time.
>
> Thanks for checking.
>
> Could it be possible to copy-paste on this thread some of the
> buildfarm logs that show the compilation failure?  No issues from me
> even if these are in Japanese.

BTW It looks like these messages can be translated to Unicode like
this, in python2:

>>> print("\202\314\214^\202\252 1
\202\314\211\274\210\370\220\224\202\250\202\346\202\321\216\300\210\370\220\224\202\306\210\331\202\310\202\350\202\334\202\267\201B".decode("SJIS"))
の型が 1 の仮引数および実引数と異なります。

... which Google translates as:

"Different from formal and actual arguments of type 1"



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Missing include in be-secure-openssl.c?
Следующее
От: Peter Smith
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: row filtering for logical replication