Re: Cirrus CI for macOS branches 16 and 15 broken
От | Thomas Munro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Cirrus CI for macOS branches 16 and 15 broken |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+hUKG+TfSujgWtZvgtinnAxeefbJc1FxjHcL8FbCkfvVAs9Nw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Cirrus CI for macOS branches 16 and 15 broken (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Cirrus CI for macOS branches 16 and 15 broken
Re: Cirrus CI for macOS branches 16 and 15 broken |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 10:55 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes: > > I still don't know what's happening. In case it helps someone else > > see it, the error comes from "sudo port unsetrequested installed". > > But in any case, switching to 2.10.1 seems to do the trick. See > > attached. > > Interesting. Now that I've finished "sudo port upgrade outdated", > my laptop is back to a state where unprivileged "port outdated" > is successful. > > What this smells like is that MacPorts has to do some kind of database > update as a result of its major version change, and there are code > paths that are not expecting that to get invoked. It makes sense > that unprivileged "port outdated" would fail to perform the database > update, but not quite as much for "sudo port unsetrequested installed" > to fail. That case seems like a MacPorts bug; maybe worth filing? Huh. Right, interesting theory. OK, I'll push that patch to use 2.10.1 anyway, and report what we observed to see what they say. It's funny that when I had an automatic "pick latest" thing, it broke on their beta release, but when I pinned it to 2.9.3, it broke when they made a new stable release anyway. A middle way would be to use a pattern that skips alpha/beta/etc...
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: