Improving the comments in pqsignal()

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thomas Munro
Тема Improving the comments in pqsignal()
Дата
Msg-id CA+hUKG+Rst1h3uo+XRgdRVnWHBa4mmj5gFbmCzZr73s-Fh_5JA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: Improving the comments in pqsignal()  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi,

While following along with Tristan and Heikki's thread about signals
in psql, it occurred to me that the documentation atop pqsignal() is
not very good:

 * we don't explain what problem it originally solved
 * we don't explain why it's still needed today
 * we don't explain what else it does for us today
 * we describe the backend implementation for Windows incorrectly (mea culpa)
 * we vaguely mention one issue with Windows frontend code, but I
think the point made is misleading, and we don't convey the scale of
the differences

Here is my attempt to improve it.

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: David Rowley
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Properly pathify the union planner
Следующее
От: Matthias van de Meent
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Table AM Interface Enhancements