Re: [PATCH] Comments related to " buffer descriptors“ cache line size"

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thomas Munro
Тема Re: [PATCH] Comments related to " buffer descriptors“ cache line size"
Дата
Msg-id CA+hUKG+N3fUcUy_VbBj938M2zjTn_ir6rCA9YR2DN_nY5NMrgQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PATCH] Comments related to " buffer descriptors“ cache line size"  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 5:28 AM Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep  4, 2020 at 11:31:55PM +0800, Kelly Min wrote:
> > I found a comment error in buffer descriptors comment. The cache line size is
> > 64 bytes, not 64 bits
>
> Thanks, fix applied to all active branches.

I find it a bit strange that our PG_CACHE_LINE_SIZE macro is defined
to be 128.  Whether that exaggerated number (unless you're on POWER,
where it's true) makes sense depends on what your goals are, as this
usage of hard-coded 64 shows...



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #16419: wrong parsing BC year in to_date() function
Следующее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: A micro-optimisation for walkdir()