On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 1:14 AM Tomas Vondra
<tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> from the archive
Ahh, so perhaps that's the key.
> I've tested this applied on 6ca547cf75ef6e922476c51a3fb5e253eef5f1b6,
> and the failure seems fairly similar to what I reported before, except
> that now it happened right at the very beginning.
Thanks, will see if I can work out why. My newer version probably has
the same problem.