Re: [GENERAL] DROP [TEMP] TABLE syntax, as reason why not?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Francisco Olarte
Тема Re: [GENERAL] DROP [TEMP] TABLE syntax, as reason why not?
Дата
Msg-id CA+bJJbxv0hqQsg+PO9BeTjuOK-nfXScaR_pPuFKf18WjnJ1Nqw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [GENERAL] DROP [TEMP] TABLE syntax, as reason why not?  (Vincenzo Romano <vincenzo.romano@notorand.it>)
Ответы Re: [GENERAL] DROP [TEMP] TABLE syntax, as reason why not?
Список pgsql-general
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Vincenzo Romano
<vincenzo.romano@notorand.it> wrote:

> Isn't a CHOICE for better syntax enough?
> Aren't symmetry and consistency valuable arguments?
> Syntactic sugar is not evil on its own.
> It can help people writing code that can be better understood.

Valid arguments, but those extensions are NOT free to develop, test
and maintain. And every syntax extensions, specially one like this,
introduces the possibility of collisions with future standards ( de
facto or de iure, although Pg already deviates from ansi on the temp
stuff ).

Francisco Olarte.


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Francisco Olarte
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] DROP [TEMP] TABLE syntax, as reason why not?
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] 'value too long' and before insert/update trigger