Re: BUG #16860: Documentation: GUC Parameters are not explained

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Francisco Olarte
Тема Re: BUG #16860: Documentation: GUC Parameters are not explained
Дата
Msg-id CA+bJJbxLWT50CaHmsRjAxJ5DVcqd8FyM7uq1ot3qPENCC7-vXw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: BUG #16860: Documentation: GUC Parameters are not explained  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: BUG #16860: Documentation: GUC Parameters are not explained  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-bugs
Tom:

On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 6:18 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes:
> > I am missing a explanation for the abbreviation "GUC" in:
> >      in
> > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sepgsql.html#SEPGSQL-PARAMETERS
> >   and https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/pgtrgm.html#id-1.11.7.40.7
> It's defined in appendix L (Acronyms).  It would not be sensible to
> duplicate the definition at every usage.

I ( not the OP ) knew the meaning ( although I had forgotten the exact
words ), and managed to find it, but had to do a full search. IMO an
entry in the index could be useful for it, even if it is just an
acronym ( I went to the HTML manual, searched in the TOC, searched in
the first couple server configuration pages, searched in the index and
then resorted to full search and got the acronyms hit in the middle,
it seems a bit hidden for me ).

Francisco Olarte.



В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: PG Bug reporting form
Дата:
Сообщение: BUG #16862: Unexpected result of checking for null "IS NOT NULL" in function
Следующее
От: Pawel Kudzia
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #16792: silent corruption of GIN index resulting in SELECTs returning non-matching rows