Re: Declarative partitioning - another take
| От | Francisco Olarte |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Declarative partitioning - another take |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+bJJbx9prrPHDSnOveqcJUfM748ohG=rjJY_Qri70Fg9dQ_tQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Declarative partitioning - another take (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 7:01 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > In the end, keywords are not the defining issue here; the issue is > whether all of this complexity around inclusive and exclusive bounds > carries its weight, and whether we want to be committed to that. > > Any other opinions out there? If it where for me I would opt for just half-open intervals. The only problem I've ever had with them is when working with FINITE ranges, i.e., there is no way of expresing the range of 8 bits integer with half open intervals of 8 bit integers, but I would happily pay that cost for the benefits of not having people unintentionally make non-contiguous date/timestamp intervals, which I periodically suffer. Francisco Olarte.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: