Re: Standbys, txid_current_snapshot, wraparound

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: Standbys, txid_current_snapshot, wraparound
Дата
Msg-id CA+U5nMLo9wGwDGxTUwsB7D0Cy4evPYLRaLGHibW+UhVcKT2FnQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Standbys, txid_current_snapshot, wraparound  (Daniel Farina <daniel@heroku.com>)
Ответы Re: Standbys, txid_current_snapshot, wraparound
Re: Standbys, txid_current_snapshot, wraparound
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 12:26 AM, Daniel Farina <daniel@heroku.com> wrote:

> Some time ago I reported bug 6291[0], which reported a Xid wraparound,
> both as reported in pg_controldata and by txid_current_snapshot.
> Unfortunately, nobody could reproduce it.
>
> Today, the same system of ours just passed the wraparound mark
> successfully at this time, incrementing the epoch.  However, two
> standbys have not done the same: they have wrapped to a low txid.  At
> this time, pg_controldata does report the correct epoch, as I read it,
> unlike the original case.
>
> I have not yet tried to reproduce this in a minimal way, but I wanted
> to relate this information as soon as possible.
>
> These systems are 9.0.6, on Ubuntu 10.04 LTS, amd64.
>
> [0]: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2011-11/msg00094.php

So we have this?

Master pg_controldata - OK txid_current_snapshot() - OK
Standby pg_controldata - OK txid_current_snapshot() - lower value

Are there just 2 standbys? So all standbys have acted identically?

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jaime Casanova
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Reporting WAL file containing checkpoint's REDO record in pg_controldata's result
Следующее
От: Magnus Hagander
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Reporting WAL file containing checkpoint's REDO record in pg_controldata's result