Re: Fast insertion indexes: why no developments

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: Fast insertion indexes: why no developments
Дата
Msg-id CA+U5nMLRTviShk4AE+m=sVYak0AmFLa7uJ8mi+wztJ0M2=NCvA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Fast insertion indexes: why no developments  (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 13 November 2013 11:54, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> wrote:

>> Load time
>> MinMax no overhead, same as raw COPY
>> BTree - considerably slower

And just as a general comment, the min max index does not slow down
COPY as the table gets larger, whereas the btree gets slower as the
table gets larger. Which is the reason Leonardo requires partitioned
tables.

-- Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Idea for debug/recovery snapshots
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Add \i option to bring in the specified file as a quoted literal