On 11 December 2012 10:39, Marko Kreen <markokr@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Would it be crazy to add an "already_freed" flag to the pg_result
>> struct which PQclear() would set, or some equivalent safety mechanism,
>> to avoid this hassle for users?
>
> Such mechanism already exist - you just need to set
> your PGresult pointer to NULL after each PQclear().
So why doesn't PQclear() do that?
Maintaining a pointer to something that no longer exists seems strange.
Under what conditions would anybody want the old pointer value after PQclear() ?
-- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services